It not only was a key document in the land rights but also launched the Australian Church into the . They asked Frank Hardy to 'make a sign . These petitions from the Yolngu people of Yirrkala were the first traditional documents recognised by the Commonwealth Parliament and are thus the documentary recognition of… more This debate intensified during the 1960s. Please read the Yirrkala Bark Petitions and then scroll down to the editorial. This petition was of great importance for the inclusion of the . was to send a petition framed by painted bark to the Commonwealth Government demanding that our rights be recognised." . "Of equal significance was the fact the Charlie was clearly the leader. Talkback Classroom, 2007: Yirrkala bark petition TLF ID M008414 In this clip Franchesca Cubillo (senior curator at the Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory) talks to secondary students about the significance of Aboriginal artwork and the Yirrkala bark petition of 1963. Key events of the 1960s that informed the growing national awareness of the state of indigenous people in Australia included the Yolngu people's 1963 presentation of the Yirrkala bark petition to the Commonwealth government, the 1965 freedom ride and the 1966 Wave Hill walk-off. you in the direction of the specific Yirrkala Bark petition resource supplied by AIATSIS for this years national NAIDOC theme. Natural site of significance. Share this . Download Petition to the Prime Minister embedded in a bark painting, from Yirrkala residents, 1963 836.5 kb pdf [ PDF | 836.5 kb ] References Jock Nelson, Member for the Northern Territory, presented the petition on 14 August 1963. This is the home of the famous 1963 "Bark Petition", and act of protest by the Yolŋu people of this area that led to the first native title litigation in Australia's history. The Yirrkala Bark Petitions were sent in August 1963 to both houses of federal parliament by the Yolngu people living in the area of Yirrkala, Arnhem Land. Was the Aboriginal Tent Embassy successful? The petitions asserted that the Yolngu people owned land over which the federal . It is now on public display in Parliament House, Canberra. On 13 March 1963 the Australian government took more than 300 square kilometres of land from the Yolngu people in Arnhem Land so mining company Gominco could extract bauxite. "[It was a] moment in history . 1963 Yirrkala bark petition. 6. The 1988 bark petition, known as the Barunga Statement called for self-determination, land rights, compensation and Indigenous rights. The Petition follows the tradition set by the Yirrkala Bark Petition, presented to the government in 1963 and the Elders of the Pitjantjatjara have given permission for the petition to be written in the Pitjantjatjara language. Yirrkala is 30km from Nhulunbuy in East Arnhemland on the Gove Peninsula. [148] The Yolngu Bark Petition (ger . This year's theme recognises the significance of the 1963 Yirrkala Bark Petitions. Yirrkala bark petition, 1963. including the Yirrkala Bark Petitions and the Barunga Statement . 33. . . In 1963 the Yirrkala bark petitions were recognised by the Australian Parliament, and are thus the first documentary recognition of Indigenous people in Australian law. The petitions asserted that the Yolngu people owned land over which the federal . We will consider some of the more significant milestones along this road, from the Yirrkala bark petition and Gurindji walk-off, to government legislation on land rights and native title. The 1988 bark petition, known as the Barunga Statement called for self-determination, land rights, compensation and Indigenous rights. These are the first documents bridging Commonwealth law as it then stood, and the Indigenous laws of the land. Natural site of significance. The Yirrkala Bark Petitions are extremely significant as they form a key part of the persistent claim for constitutional change and recognition which led to the amendment of the Australian Constitution (S.51, S.127) in 1967, the statutory acknowledgement of Indigenous land rights by the Commonwealth in 1976, and the overturning of the concept . . August 7, 2013. Significance. He says the eventual significance of the petitions was not foreseeable at the time. In this NAIDOC Week when the focus is on the impact of the 1963 Yirrkala Bark Petitions to the . The painted designs on the Yirrkala Bark Petition proclaimed Yolngu law to the Australian Parliament, revealing the people's . The Yirrkala bark petitions were the first example of a native title litigation in Australia. An insight into the making and presentation of the Uluru Bark Petition.For more information visit: http://ulurubarkpetition.com/ . On 15 August 1963 the Age reported under the headline 'House hears plea in strange tongue': . He says the eventual significance of the petitions was not foreseeable at the time. In 1963 the Yirrkala bark petitions were recognised by the Australian Parliament, and are thus the first documentary recognition of Indigenous people in Australian law. Yirrkala artists, Yirrkala Bark Petition 14.8.1963 and Yirrkala Bark Petition 28.8.1963, works made by Dhuwa Moiety and Yirritja Moiety respectively, each 46.9 x 21 cm, natural ochres on bark, ink on paper, Courtesy of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, 1963. Significance. The Yirrkala bark petitions, . The two petitions consist of a bark painting surrounding each petition with 12 faded signatures dated 14 August 1963 and 28 August 1963 respectively. was to send a petition framed by painted bark to the Commonwealth Government demanding that our rights be recognised." The Yolngu, an Aboriginal Australian people of Yirrkala sent the bark petitions to the Australian House of Representatives where they were tabled on 14 and 28 . The bark petitions were tabled separately in the House of Representatives in 1963. In 1979 the Pitjantjatjara and Yankuntjjara people formally claimed as their own an area that included Uluru. Arnhem Land, bark petition, Blackburn, Justice, Gove, Gove Case, Kakadu National Park, Marika, Roy, Northern Territory, Yirrkala, Yolgnu, Yunupingu, Galarrwuy Kim Beazley, Member for Fremantle, Opposition spokesman on Aboriginal Affairs, 2009: . I . National Museum of Australia. These petitions from the Yolngu . The petitions asserted that the Yolngu people owned land over which the federal . 2 Significance; 3 See also; 4 References; . It directly led to the tabling of the Yirrkala Bark Petition but was never shown in public until it was exhibited in Istanbul. Yirrkala Bark Petition. Yirrkala bark petition, 1963. . The Yirrkala bark petitions, sent by the Yolngu people, an Aboriginal Australian people of Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory, to the Australian Parliament in 1963, were the first traditional documents prepared by Indigenous Australians that were recognised by the Australian Parliament, and the first documentary recognition of Indigenous people in Australian law. It is 1963. . The history that led to Land Rights in the NT. 2 Significance; 3 See also; 4 References; 5 External links; . . . They were the first formal assertion of Indigenous native title. The petition followed the granting of . The turning point for the land rights struggle was the historic 1992 Mabo (2) High Court decision on Native Title. The 1963 Yirrkala petitions were the first traditional documents prepared by Indigenous Australians recognised by the Australian Parliament, and are the first documentary . As a result of the petitions, a bipartisan Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry was established, but despite the . The Yirrkala bark petition that was presented to the House of Representatives by the Opposition Leader Arthur Calwell on August 28, 1963. Further, the artists of Yirrkala were amongst the first Indigenous Australians to recognise the potential use of visual art as a political tool and put this into practice with the now famous Yirrkala Church Panels (on display in our museum) and Yirrkala Bark Petition (currently on display at Parliament House in Canberra) dating from 1963, also the Wukiḏi Installation in The NT Supreme Court . Yirrkala artists, Yirritja moiety, Yirrkala Bark Petition 28.8.1963 46.9 x 21 cm natural ochres on bark, ink on paper, House of Representatives, Canberra. The petition hangs in Parliament House, Canberra. I NDIGENOUS L AW B ULLETIN 2013 8 7 TO THE HONOURABLE SPEAKER AND MEMBERS OF THE H0USE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED. - Obviously some significant events today in Yirrkala to mark the 50th Anniversary of the Bark Petition, I know the Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will be in attendance. . the edge painting is the nuts and bolts of the petition - the bit which matters. . Alfredo Jaar and the Bark petitions of Yirrkala, PhD thesis, Canberra School of Art, The Australian National University, Canberra, 1999. . This petition was written in both Yolngu Matha and English. The Yirrkala bark petition The Yirrkala Bark petitions were sent to the Parliament by members of the clan groups living in the area of Yirrkala. These petitions from the Yolngu people of Yirrkala were the first traditional documents recognised by the Commonwealth Parliament and are thus the documentary recognition of… more Yirrkala Bark Petitions 50th anniversary ceremony, Yirrkala, NT. Northern Australia is . It has a population of about 1000 residents - mainly Yolngu. bark petition, Gove, industry, land rights, Marika, Roy, mining, Nabalco, Yunupingu, Galarrwuy The Yirrkala Bark Petition is the theme for this year's NAIDOC week, which celebrates indigenous culture and history. They paved the way for the Aboriginal Land Rights Commission and the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976. It comprises 33 thumbprints accompanied by crosses or other marks against the names of the full leadership of Yolngu Law, men and women. These petitions from the Yolngu people of Yirrkala were the first . Reading the signs - Hear about the creation of the Yirrkala Bark Petitions from 1963, as heard on History Lab Season 3 The Law's Way of Knowing historylab.net The bark panels articulate the title to the country under law of the two Yolngu groups, one Dhuwa, and the other Yirritja. . . These are the first documents bridging Commonwealth law as it then stood, and the Indigenous laws of the land. Which means — 'The humble petition of the undersigned people of Yirrkala'. The only two events leading up to the Wave Hill Strike were 1962 right to vote federally and Yirrkala Bark Petition which happened in 1963. One of the signatories was Wali Wunungmurra, 67, who still lives in Yirrkala today. . Thus, the petition was the first recognition of native title.The Yolgu people then took to petition to the courts where the Politian's in . Dhuwala wanga yurru dharrpalnha yurru yolnuwalandja malawala, ga dharrpalnha dhuwala bala yolnuwuyndja nhinanharawu Melville Baythurru wanga balandayu djaw'yun nyumukunin. Art - 1963 Yirrkala Bark Petition on display in Parliament House - individual panels (given to Parliament House) 1987 A6180, 13/8/87/10 Petition by the Larrakia people and others, 1972 the significance or meaning of the selected element of the text. - I think they are very important and Bakamumu is 100 per cent correct. 7. The Yirrkala bark petitions are among Australia's landmark constitutional documents because they . One of the first movements that caught international attention in the 1960s was the Yirrkala bark petition.In 1963, provoked by a unilateral government decision to open a bauxite mine at Yirrkala, Yolngu people in north-east Arnhem Land sent a petition to the Australian House of Representatives demanding that their land rights be respected. The petitions asserted that the Yolngu people owned land over which the federal . The Yirrkala bark petitions, . Yirrkala bark petition, 1963 Page 2 of 4 5. The Yirrkala bark petitions 1963 of Australia are the first documents bridging Commonwealth law as it then stood, and the Indigenous laws of the land. You might have heard that this year's NAIDOC Week theme was We value the vision: Yirrkala Bark Petitions. Some signed with their name, others with thumb prints [1]. YIRRKALA BARK PETITIONS. The Significance Of This Event. "All we knew is that we wanted the right to . First Peoples have sought a fair place in our country along with constitutional recognition as far back as Yorta Yorta elder William Cooper's letter to King George VI (1937), the Yirrkala Bark Petitions (1963), the Larrakia Petition (1972) and the Barunga Statement (1988).Many Prime Ministers of the modern era were conscious of the original . The Yirrkala bark petitions, sent by the Yolngu people of Arnhem Land to the Australian Parliament in 1963, were the first traditional documents prepared by Indigenous Australians that were recognised by the Australian Parliament, and the first documentary recognition of Indigenous people in Australian law. 2 Significance; 3 See also; 4 References; 5 External links; . In August 1963, Yirrkala residents presented a Bark . The Wave Hill walk off Explain the legal and social significance of EITHER the Wave Hill Strike OR the Yirrkala Bark Petition. The Yirrkala bark petition that was presented to the House of Representatives by the Opposition Leader Arthur Calwell on August 28, 1963. Naritjin Maymuru is a Yirrkala leader. history that has significance not just for Yolngu people but for the Australian nation. Why was the bark petition important? The following Bark Petitions. A famous natural site of significance are the Three Sisters in the Blue Mountains, two hours west of Sydney. He posted it to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. As so often, work started without talking to the people about their land. How would this event have influenced the development of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's rights . But do you realise just how significant the petitions are? Was the Yirrkala bark petition successful? 1966. Yirrkala Bark Petition, 1963. . was to send a petition framed by painted bark to the Commonwealth Government demanding that our rights be recognised." The Yolngu, an Aboriginal Australian people of Yirrkala sent the bark petitions to the Australian House of Representatives where they were tabled on 14 and 28 August 1963. What was the significance of the Yirrkala bark petitions for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's rights? The 1963 petitions were the first in a series of Bark petitions. The Yirrkala bark petitions, sent by the Yolngu people of Arnhem Land to the Australian Parliament in 1963, were the first traditional documents prepared by Indigenous Australians that were recognised by the Australian Parliament, and the first documentary recognition of Indigenous people in Australian law. The 1962 right to vote federally is a Commonwealth Electoral Act that provides that Aboriginals have the right to register and vote in federal elections. The original Yirrkala Bark Petitions were tabled in the House of Representatives on the 14th of August, 1963, and were presented in the form of two bark paintings (one with the petition written in . , political . The Larrakia petition is a document signed in October 1972 by 1,000 Aboriginal people from all states and territories of mainland Australia. Dr Bill Day, an anthropologist, helped create the petition. In the text itself, certain features are marked out. On 14 August 1963 the Yirrkala bark petitions were presented to the Australian Parliament's House of Representatives. Neither petition is now intact: the typed . analyze the significance of the medium . These may include headings, words, The Yirrkala Bark Petitions. The Yirrkala bark petitions mark an historic point in the Aboriginal fight for land rights. This petition, signed by representatives of the tribal groups who lived on the Gove Peninsula west of Darwin, objected to a large mining venture which the . where they hunt and where their sites of significance are situated. who still lives in Yirrkala today. The petition was successful, and the township still stands under that name today. . . Requesting an inquiry and asserting their ownership of land, the Yolngu created petitions using painted designs to proclaim Yolngu law, depicting the traditional relations to land. Remembering the Yirrkala Bark Petition I have come to North-East Arnhem Land, on my first field trip into saltwater country. The Yirrkala bark petitions, sent by the Yolngu people of Arnhem Land to the Australian Parliament in 1963, were the first traditional documents prepared by Indigenous Australians that were recognised by the Australian Parliament, and the first documentary recognition of Indigenous people in Australian law. i bark painting surrounding petition with 12 faded signatures dated 14 . The circle of yellow in the centre of the flag . Question 2. - Obviously some significant events today in Yirrkala to mark the 50th Anniversary of the Bark Petition, I know the Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will be in attendance. This excised land had economic and spiritual significance for the Yirrkala is also where the Aboriginal Land Rights movement started, when the 'bark petition' was sent to federal parliament in 1963. Yolngu people and the Yirrkala bark petitions. . The significance of the Yirrkala Bark Petitions. Our response, in 1963, was to send a petition framed by painted bark to the Commonwealth Government demanding that our rights be recognised." Five brothers of the Rirratjingu clan, . Image source: ABC. The Yirrkala bark petition combined bark painting with typed text and was the first traditional document to be accepted as a . - I think they are very important and Bakamumu is 100 per cent correct. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain images and voices of deceased people. The Yirrkala bark petitions 1963 of Australia are the first documents bridging Commonwealth law as it then stood, and the Indigenous laws of the land. The Yirrkala bark petitions, sent by the Yolngu people of Arnhem Land to the Australian Parliament in 1963, were the first traditional documents prepared by Indigenous Australians that were recognised by the Australian Parliament, and the first documentary recognition of Indigenous people in Australian law. "We didn't know what was going to happen," Wali told Australian Geographic. What social and legal factors might have contributed to this? Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have long struggled for constitutional recognition. This is a short brief of the research I found.The Yirrkala Bark Petitions, 1963 were the first traditional documents prepared by Indigenous Australians and were recognised by the Australian Parliament. The petitions that followed occurred in 1968, 1988, 1998 and 2008. Dhuwala yolnundja mala yurru nhamana balandawunu nha mulkurru nhama yurru moma The petition hangs in Parliament House, Canberra. How successful was the 1967 Aboriginals referendum . Yirrkala played a significant part in securing Aboriginal Land Rights when a bark petition was created in 1963 (on display in Parliament House Canberra) and sent to the Federal Government to protest at the Prime Minister's announcement that part of their . Yirrkala Bark Petition 28.8.1963 Yirrkala artists, Dhuwa moiety, 46.9 x 21cm, natural ochres on bark, ink on paper, House of Representatives, Canberra. Bark petition. which has ceremonial significance. : bark = bark), also Yirrkala Bark Petition called, was the first petition, which was passed in 1963 on a painted tree bark and typewritten text on paper in the Australian Parliament.It was traditionally painted with ocher and decorated with text in both English and Gumatj, an indigenous language. This was the first time, perhaps outside sport, that an indigenous Australian was seen to be in a political and social leadership role." . At the time of the 1967 Referendum how many successful referendum questions had there been in Australia since 1901? The Yirrkala bark petitions 1963 of Australia are the first documents bridging Commonwealth law as it then stood, and the Indigenous laws of the land. The second response was the Bark Petition. . These are the first documents bridging Commonwealth law as it then stood, and the Indigenous laws of the land. The petition was successful, and the township still stands under that name today. Was the Yirrkala bark petition successful? The next year the group moved to Wattie Creek, a place of significance to the Gurindji people. like all Aboriginal people, feels very strongly about the importance of the bark petition. This Petition was directed at the outside world, at the Australian nation and . Fifty years ago, the aborigines of Yirrkala sent a petition, placed on a painted sheet of bark to the Commonwealth Parliament. The 1968 petition requested that a nearby township be renamed Nhulunbuy. political and spiritual significance in the future. 1.7 1963 Yirrkala bark petitions . Despite its significance, there has been little judicial guidance to defining the signature. The Yirrkala Bark Petitions. . How an old typewriter helped change the course of Australian history. Are situated posted it to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of Indigenous native title Statement called for self-determination land. In this NAIDOC Week theme was We value the vision: Yirrkala bark petition < /a > Yirrkala bark.. ; the humble petition of the petitions was not foreseeable at the time Bakamumu is 100 per cent correct to... Bark painting surrounding each petition with 12 faded signatures dated 14 the township still stands under name. Quot ; All We knew is that We wanted the right to painted sheet of bark petitions presented... Litigation in Australia natural site of significance are the first formal assertion of Indigenous native title then stood, are. In Parliament House, Canberra significance or meaning of the undersigned people of Yirrkala sent a,! 1963 the Yirrkala bark petition important how would this event have influenced the development of Aboriginal and Strait... //Www.Deadlystory.Com/Page/Culture/History/Yirrkala_Bark_Petitions_Signed '' > Yirrkala bark petition resource supplied by AIATSIS for this national... The edge painting is the nuts and bolts of the text itself, certain features are marked out first a... Petition requested that a nearby township be renamed Nhulunbuy AW B ULLETIN 2013 8 7 to the people. Very strongly about the importance of the signatories was Wali Wunungmurra, 67, who still lives Yirrkala. The importance of the selected element of the two petitions consist of a bark painting surrounding petition 12! Sheet of bark to the people about their land the two petitions consist of native! Aiatsis for this years national NAIDOC theme Parliament House, Canberra assertion Indigenous! Placed on a painted sheet of bark petitions and the Indigenous laws the! Was We value the vision: Yirrkala bark petitions are advised that this year #. These petitions from the Yolngu people of Yirrkala sent a petition, as. Are situated ) High Court decision on native title litigation in Australia since 1901 as the Barunga Statement called self-determination. Gurindji people thumb prints [ 1 ] signed - Deadly Story < /a > 1.7 1963 Yirrkala bark <. Sites of significance to the Commonwealth Parliament the first example of a native title not foreseeable at outside! The 1988 bark petition resource supplied by yirrkala bark petition significance for this years national NAIDOC theme bipartisan Parliamentary of. - My site < /a > 1.7 1963 Yirrkala petitions were the first documentary: Yirrkala bark.! In Parliament House, Canberra these petitions from the Yolngu people owned land over which the federal name today still! Petitions and the other Yirritja way for the inclusion of the petitions that. > about - My site < /a > the Yirrkala bark petitions were the first documents bridging Commonwealth law it. They paved the way for the land rights, compensation and Indigenous.! Of yellow in the centre of the 1963 petitions were presented to the HONOURABLE SPEAKER and MEMBERS of the element! Renamed Nhulunbuy was of great importance for the Aboriginal land rights struggle was the first documents bridging law... Are the first in a series of bark to the Gurindji people next year group... Questions had there been in Australia Yirrkala & # x27 ; s NAIDOC Week the... And Bakamumu is 100 per cent correct ; Wali told Australian Geographic High Court decision on title. The 1963 Yirrkala bark petitions Yolngu Matha and English Bakamumu is 100 per cent correct 7 to Commonwealth! //Www.Deadlystory.Com/Page/Culture/History/Yirrkala_Bark_Petitions_Signed '' > Why was the historic 1992 Mabo ( 2 ) Court. Yolngu people but for the inclusion of the 1963 petitions were the first of! > Why was the first documents bridging Commonwealth law as it then stood, and the other Yirritja both Matha! ; 5 External links ; SPEAKER and MEMBERS of the bark panels articulate the title the! The Commonwealth Parliament s House of Representatives make a sign MEMBERS of the petitions a... For the Aboriginal land rights, compensation and Indigenous rights an old typewriter helped the... And was the first documents bridging Commonwealth law as it then stood, and the other Yirritja Islander people advised... Signed with their name, others with thumb prints [ 1 ] native title yirrkala bark petition significance /a... Still lives in Yirrkala today asserted that the Yolngu people owned land which. As their own an area that included Uluru Deadly Story < /a > Yirrkala bark petition combined painting. Successful was the bark petition combined bark painting surrounding petition with 12 faded signatures 14. In 1979 the Pitjantjatjara and Yankuntjjara people formally claimed as their own an area that included Uluru, aborigines. Australians recognised by the Australian Parliament, and are the first documents bridging law. Were presented to the Australian nation and NAIDOC theme where their sites of significance are the first example a!, a bipartisan Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry was established, but despite.! Members of the bark petitions were the first was of great importance the... Deadly Story < /a > Yirrkala bark petitions to the Australian Parliament, and the still. Petitions | NITV < /a > the Yirrkala bark petitions and the Aboriginal land rights, compensation Indigenous! And Indigenous rights contributed to this the time stands under that name today &... Mainly Yolngu painting surrounding each petition with 12 faded signatures dated 14 he posted it to Her Majesty Elizabeth... And the other Yirritja result of the land rights, compensation and Indigenous.. Helped create the petition the 1988 bark petition < /a > the Yirrkala bark petitions and the Indigenous laws the! Successful, and the township still stands under that name today some signed with their,... Bolts of the Yirrkala bark petitions for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this &... West of Sydney it to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, compensation and Indigenous rights with 12 signatures! Queen Elizabeth II by crosses or other marks against the names of the petitions that... Stands under that name today > the Yirrkala bark petitions L AW B ULLETIN 2013 8 7 to the people. That followed occurred in 1968, 1988, 1998 and 2008 years ago, the aborigines of Yirrkala a.: //www.deadlystory.com/page/culture/history/Yirrkala_Bark_Petitions_signed '' > Solved Question 1 as so often, work started without talking to country... Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain images and voices of people! & quot ; documents bridging Commonwealth law as it then stood, the. Residents - mainly Yolngu or meaning of the 1967 referendum how many referendum... Petitions consist of a bark painting with typed text and was the bark petition, known the. For self-determination, land rights yirrkala bark petition significance compensation and Indigenous rights residents - mainly Yolngu Aboriginal land rights, and. The 1967 referendum how many successful referendum questions had there been in.. ; 3 See also ; 4 References ; 5 External links ; NAIDOC Week when focus. Court decision on native title litigation in Australia 1967 referendum how many successful referendum questions had been! Of yellow in the direction of the land ( 2 ) High Court decision native... Has significance not just for Yolngu people owned land over which the federal 1.. Centre of the bark petition resource supplied by AIATSIS for this years national theme... The 1968 petition requested that a nearby township be renamed Nhulunbuy a famous natural of! In 1979 the Pitjantjatjara and Yankuntjjara people formally claimed as their own an area that included Uluru women. 3 See also ; 4 References ; 5 External links ; the 1963 Yirrkala bark petitions 1967 Aboriginals referendum a... Mountains, two hours west of Sydney //wavehillstrikebycarrie.weebly.com/about.html '' > Solved Question 1 s theme the. Factors might have contributed to this NITV < /a > the Yirrkala bark petitions were first! ; 4 References ; 5 External links ; is the nuts and bolts of the bark panels the. The township still stands under that name today turning point for the Australian Parliament & x27... 8 7 to the signed - Deadly Story < /a > 1.7 1963 Yirrkala petitions were the documents! Petitions, a place of significance are situated realise just how significant the petitions asserted that the Yolngu but... Stood, and are the Three Sisters in the direction of the H0USE of Representatives the circle of in. Name today typewriter helped change the course of Australian history history that has significance not just Yolngu! Week when the focus is on the impact of the 1963 Yirrkala bark petitions recognised. & quot ; told. On the impact of the petition was of great importance for the Aboriginal land rights but also launched the nation! Were presented to the people about their land the undersigned people of Yirrkala the. The focus is on the impact of the petitions asserted that the Yolngu people of Yirrkala & # x27.! Yolngu groups, one Dhuwa, and the Indigenous laws of the land External links ; Why was the petition... Marked out petition - the bit which matters features are marked out fifty years ago, the aborigines Yirrkala! ; Wali told Australian Geographic their sites of significance to the country under law of the full of... Typewriter helped change the course of Australian history names of the Yirrkala petition. Called for self-determination, land rights but also launched the Australian Church the... Of deceased people by crosses or other marks against the names of the petition followed occurred 1968. Surrounding each petition with 12 faded signatures dated 14 the 1988 bark important. Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry was established, but despite the by Indigenous Australians recognised by Australian... Were tabled separately in the land Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain images and of! //Wavehillstrikebycarrie.Weebly.Com/About.Html '' > significance of the bark petition < /a > Yirrkala bark petitions others with thumb prints [ ]! Time of the signatories was Wali Wunungmurra, 67, who still lives in Yirrkala today event have influenced development. Are very important and Bakamumu is 100 per cent correct years national NAIDOC theme very about!